Account Login
Circumcised by Step-parents
I am19 years old, and I was forcefully circumcised by my step-parents when I was 16. They didn't bring the decision right away, I was living for over 2 yrs with them before I was operated against my will. The reason stated to me was slight UTI and balanitis, which were treated and gone with using antibiotics. However, my step-mother, who is a medical doctor, specialised in urology insisted that I "should undergo minor surgery, to avoid any further complications". She organized it with her female friend doctor, who checked me up, and did the surgery, despite my complaints. I was told it was all "for my own health benefit" and that "young men are highly recommended undergoing it (circumcision procedure) if any foreskin problems occur". I felt totally embarassed even during the check-ups, as I was treated as if I had no say over it! I was exposed to MD who did the check-up and nurses (2 were present), but also my step-mother who insisted to be present "as MD and family member". IMO, she has a circumcision fetish, and she used me to fullfil it. Anyway, it was very painful (not the operation, but the aftermath) and the result is high and very tightly circumcised **, and some sensitivity lost. But, the feeling of humiliation and degradation are the worst.
If that was me than at some point i would somehow get back at them and while you where not a child or if so barely they still took advantage of somebody weaker who was in a bad situation and if you where female nobody would care if you where older or not.
Who wants to help me get circumcised
IMO, sorry to hear your story. At least be thankful that it was high, since high leaves you with more inner foreskin which is more sensitive. Did they excise the frenulum? That also is sensitive and should be left.
There is nothing better than the natural condition. Circumcision, in most cases is a harmful operation done for cosmetic reasons. The ** is covered with bacteria, circumcised or not. The foreskin actually has an immune function, as it is a mucous membrane. This is not to mention that the female external genitalia and ** are also covered with bacteria, similar to the foreskin.
The young man in this post lost most of his sensitivity and protection as a result of his step-parents whim. This is child abuse.
Your step mother absolutely did the correct thing! When she mentioned UTI’s she was probably not referring to any portion of your urinary tract. She was hoping to protect your future female ** partners from obnoxious bacterial infections as well as the yeast yukkies.
The foreskin hosts a micro biome that is not always compatible with the female microbiome. Circumcising dries up the tiny environment so the ** becomes relatively sterile on the outside. Your step mom was not stealing from you but rather was giving a gift to her future step daughter in law.
If you are gay and will not be entering any woman ever then she would then owe you an apology. Is this possibly the case?
She obviously approves of your fatherhood potential or she might have considered removing more. She is not being mean or she might have opted for glans removal as well.
I agree with most of what you said except the glans removal; I don't think that's an option. Anyway I agree that step mom approves of son's fatherhood potential. A nice cut makes him much more desirable to women
I help out in an orphanage, we usually make sure every boy is tightly circumcised. I they already are it's fine if or to much of the foreskin is left we correct this issue quickly.
Nice uniform appearance, everybody is tight and dry. Nothing to pull on, pick at, play with or pee through. "Tight is right," take it all off.
Absolutely, skin it tight as a drum.
Probably a lot of boys in the 10-14 age group who are circumcised could use a good tightening up.
Agreed a tight circumcision is a must.
Because u are a **?
That's wonderful, we do boys a favor by circumcising them.
Who is we?
If this is true then u wouldn't mind naming this orphanage now, would u?.....
I recall seeing a youtube video some time ago in which a male doctor circumcised a boy of about 12 with a mogen clamp (boy's face not shown). The boy was awake for the procedure, and handled it very well. The doctor was very business-like and serious, but his female nurse/assistant was acting kinda goofy, and obviously enjoyed watching the boy's circumcision.
I love such women. I want to meet one with a circumcision fetish. Please, write to me: krawdaw@wp.pl
I also got circumcised for my ex-girlfriend ...
This is a human rights violation. Parents do not have the right to harm children. End of story.
Parents have the legal right to have a child circumcised, and there's nothing anybody can do about it. THAT'S the real end of story.
We will see about that. Legality does not define morality. Racism used to be legal and encouraged through segregation. Slavery used to be legal. Even the Holocaust was legal. Now people scoff at those ideas and deeds. The silent ones will slowly show others how hurt we are by having our bodies mutilated at birth. The law will catch up, and the truth will be told. Most people actually do not know the difference between good and evil - as it only took years to finally allow women to vote. How can a person truly be free if that person is sexually maimed by his or her own parents without question? What is freedom then? Are we free to live a life with whatever remains of our bodies when we become 18? Every human is born with the right at a bare minimum to the whole body nature has provided him or her with. We are born with the right to speak freely. We are born with the right to self defence. Other rights become active with age - voting for example. However, make no mistake - a person who thinks it is ok to violate that right on any grounds other than to prevent death itself is the reason why pain still exists in society. People who trample on the rights of others are the reasons war and pain exist within the world.
Blah! Blah! Blah! Word salad. Utterly meaningless. Parents still have the right to have minor children circumcised.
That's not true whatsoever they do not have that right in any free country FACT
Yes they do! Hello, America? Free country?
Just because it is currently legal, does not mean it’s moral nor ethical. Whipping kids in school was legal, now it isn’t. Female circumcision is illegal. **, slavery was legal but we got smart enough too outlaw it. Circumcision can and should be outlawed, too
It's a mothers choice to circumcise, not his.
You are a ** woman
IMO: Ideally, it should have been done at birth. If not at birth, then about 10-14. Boys are usually still growing, at this age. It gives them more time to get used to being cut, than having it done later, and it gets rid of the distractions that having a foreskin can cause a teen or pre-teen boy.
Having a foreskin gives boys some capabilities that not all parents would necessarily approve of them having, and I'm not referring to m*st*rb*t***. If this story is true, I suspect this may have been the case with you, and you may be leaving out some of the details.
What other thing are you referring to if it isn’t m*sturb*tion?
Several things. They can put foreign objects under their foreskins. I've heard reports of small toys, leggo blocks, chestnuts, small candies ("Mom, Johnny gave me a gummy bear, and it tasted funny..."), and live bugs(!). They can do "charged shots," that is pinching the opening to the foreskin closed, and pe*ing in it to make it artificially balloon, then release it all in a big gush, some of which may actually hit the toilet bowl. Or, pinch it it partially closed to increase the pressure and the range, and do "long shots." Circumcision, especially a tight one, also prevents or discourages certain kinds of "experimentation."
What kinds of “experimentation”?
Experimentation is good. Parents who fire gum we to avoid this are idiots and prudes.
LMAO!!! So we should also circumcise girls because they might put candy and bugs in their vaginas!
Step moms have quite a reputation online, at least, for having step sons deprived of some skin. I think women, including moms and step moms really do prefer circumcision, but how often they get teen boys cut is debatable. I'm somewhat skeptical about these stories, but they are fun to read, and probably at least some of them are true.
Im a stepmom to a 15 year old son. he has no other choice. I got his fathers permission so im having him circumcised. my poor stepson. call me mean. im taking off all his foreskin and even his frunelem. say goodbye to masturbating my son.
You are cruel. People like you are why ** exists.
This may be fake, But, he can still **, he just can't ** using his foreskin, because he won't have one. Give him a large jar of Vaseline as a circumcision present and a peace offering. He doesn't really need it, but he may like using it now. And be nice to him. What goes around comes around. He may be the one who chooses your nursing home when you're older...
You should ask the dr. to cut him low and very tight with complete frenulum removal. This is how my foreskin was circumcised around your sons age, with the scar right under the glans and tight when soft. Removing all the inner foreskin and frenulum make the most radical change for masturbation. Email me alex.rosen95 at protonmail.com.
I believe low and tight is the most difficult type of circumcision to "restore," or stretch to make a faux foreskin, because it removes all the inner foreskin which is easier to stretch. If all the inner foreskin is completely removed, you can have most of the frenulum removed too, but it's a good idea to leave a little bit, because you don't want him to make love like a jackhammer.
Won't stop mas*turb*tion, It WILL make it rather more inconvenient, and it'll probably take him longer to get off, and he won't do it quite as much but he'll manage> And, if you were worth your salt as stepmom, you'll keep him well supplied with Vaseline, so he won't hate you. You really should leave a little inner foreskin or a little frenulum, but tight is fine.
An old fashioned "spoiler," tight and dry.
I'm a Jewish stepmom and my 12 year old son has a real masturbation problem, our pediatrician says circumcision will slow this down. She gave him a high and tight cut removing as much skin as possible, it seems to have broken the cycle, he claims his erections are painful and he can no longer feel anything.
"the result is high and very tightly circumcised..."
A good circumcision doesn't leave anything to play with.
Yes, it should deter masturbation and make it painful to play with.
Of course she has a circumcision fetish. A lot of women do. They get a charge out of getting boys or men cut, and any excuse will do. Any circumcision will do, too, but if they can get you cut tightly, that's a real score for them. Most women like the idea of no foreskin, and some of them will do everything they can to get rid of yours if you have one. She probably didn't intended to hurt you the way you describe, though I don't doubt this was a humiliating experience for you, and caused you emotional pain. On the bright side, remember she is woman, and knows exactly what women like, and so did the doctor who snipped you.
Im 14. my stepmom made me have what she wanted to be for the circumcision. she made every decision. they took all of my foreskin. and my frunelem. im still very mad.
You can legally sue when you are 18. Countries are finally banning this for men due to the fact it is a human rights violation. No human being has the right to deprive another of bodily autonomy. Also, aspiring MD here. First Do No Harm. Period.
You may be an aspiring MD, but you're certainly not an aspiring lawyer. Lots of luck to anybody who wastes their time and money trying to sue their parents for having the circumcised--they're going to need it!
She knows what girls like--and don't like.
I think boys should be circumcised, but she should have offered some compromise or flexibility. On the other hand, you'll be free of her someday, and don't let this experience ruin your life. You still have everything you really need, and it still works. It may be hard to do, but try to put the experience behind you.
She will be old an senile one day and you can get power of attorney and make her life a living **. Choose what doctors she sees and even where she lives.
She knew what was best, you don't need a useless foreskin, I would circumcise you too.
Yes most women secretly have a circumcision fetish and will go to great lengths to circumcise their sons before they can have a say.
Possibly fiction, or exaggerated. Sounds like at least some of the aspects of this story are fictitious.
I don't know if this is fiction or not, but female doctors do have a reputation, online, at least, for doing tight circumcisions. The CDC recommends that all teen boys who are sexually active be circumcised, if they are not already. Most uncut teen boys, in the US at least, would welcome a chance to be circumcised.
It is best to circumcise all males tightly for their own good.